Results report
Is your board governance AI-ready?
A five-minute assessment to see how your board’s AI use, policies, information handling, and governance controls are lining up.
Three stages of readiness
ExploringUnderstanding use and risk
EstablishingPutting foundations in place
AI-ReadyAligning governed workflowsThis is not an audit or a pass/fail test. It gives you a practical snapshot of the foundations your institution has in place for responsible AI use in board work.
8 questions · approximately 3–5 minutes
Tell us about your institution
These details help us understand the mix of institutions represented in the seminar series.
Your responses calculate your result and may be analyzed in aggregate to shape the AGB OnBoard seminar discussion. The assessment does not ask for confidential board information.
Your AI Governance Readiness
Where you stand
ExploringEstablishingAI-ReadyYour seminar discussion signals
Your responses also highlight what may be slowing progress, where AI could provide practical value, and what your board may need next. These insights provide context for your result but do not affect your readiness stage.
What this combination suggests
Prepare for the seminar
Use these personalized questions to connect your result to a real board workflow, decision, or governance challenge. Add an optional reflection beneath any question you would like the seminar to address.
Share a question about AI use, policy, security, trustee adoption, technology, or another governance challenge.
Your question will be connected to your assessment and used to shape the seminar series. Individual responses will not be displayed or attributed publicly.
Your personalized questions are saved with your assessment. Any written reflections you choose to submit will also be connected to your assessment and used to help shape the seminar discussion. Individual responses will not be displayed or attributed publicly.
A governance-first evaluation lens
As you compare AI approaches, evaluate the workflow—not only the output. Look for whether AI can support board work without moving it outside the controls the board already relies on.
Clear boundaries for provider data use, retention, access, and security.
Trustees, staff, and committees can access only the information appropriate to their roles.
Source visibility and human review remain in place before AI-supported work becomes official.
Auditability and retention align with institutional requirements and board practices.
A strong approach should build these controls into the board workflow rather than ask policy alone to carry the risk.
Save your results or discuss what comes next
Bring your benchmark to the seminar, or book time with the AGB OnBoard team to discuss your results and practical next steps.